Imagine retrieving your mail from your letterbox and noticing that all the envelopes have been ripped open, and sloppily re-sealed with a sticker reading: “This mail has been opened and inspected for quality control and training purposes”. Imagine even more bizarrely: not even caring about that and even accepting this as a normal function of doing business with the post office, or with the company which sent you the letter in the first place.
The disclaimer: “This call may be recorded for quality and training purposes” is one which I’m hired to voice several times in a day — and it’s a phrase which we all hear as a matter of course whenever we call anywhere. It’s as accepted and normal as “Your call is important to us”, or “Please listen to all the selections, as our menu has recently changed.”
Moreover: it’s a disregarded at the Terms of Agreements we encounter all the time on websites and just click “I Accept” – an error in judgement, as the recent Facebook security scandal has illustrated clearly.
As a caller, I used to take them at their word. I envisioned a training session in which a manager, in front of a group of call center agents says: “Now, listen to this call on November 14th, in which Stan diffuses this lady’s anger at being signed up for the yearly fee Visa Gold Card, and he switches her to the no-fee Classic II card. Even got her to agree to receiving a mail-out about travel insurance. Exactly what we want you people to do! Good work, Stan!”
And it’s true: quality control is still a large component and reason behind call recording technology — it’s a great way to gauge performance of workers, to track efficiency, and head off problem/ineffective employees at the pass.
Consider, though, the even more self-protective aspects which primarily drives firms to implement call recording: to insulate the company from lawsuits. Audio evidence that their employee behaved appropriately, accurately, and legally — is invaluable. What used to be an “our word against theirs” scenario can easily be reviewed, analyzed and verified.
More sinister, though, is the use of carefully planned and executed information-gathering techniques by call-center staff which can be recorded, reviewed, and analyzed for demographic and marketing purposes. Information freely divulged by the caller about their income, their spending patterns, how often they call, and their general perception of the company, can also be elicited by well-placed questions on the part of the call-center agent — providing useful feedback from the customer, given somewhat unknowingly and unsuspectingly; recorded and preserved for posterity. The idea that there is software out there which analyzes the mood and emotional levels of a caller is also in use; an invaluable tool which can give a live agent a heads-up about the emotional state of the caller they’re about to engage with; slightly sinister information to be collected about you, without you even knowing about it.
All but 12 US States — and Canada and the UK — require only one-party notification (meaning that only one of the party on a two-party call needs to know the call is being recorded). In all other areas, “consent” must be given by callers by hearing the recorded disclaimer, and the continuation of the phone call indicates their compliance. An automatic tone must be repeated at regular intervals throughout the call, occurring every 12 to 15 seconds and must be audible to both parties.
What can you do if you are not completely comfortable with the idea of having your call recorded? You can request that the recorder be turned off, or elect to contact the company in an alternate method. Chances are, you will weigh the cost of having the matter take up even more of your time by writing them a letter instead; like our ever-expanding transparency and our ever-shrinking entitlement to privacy, chances are you will tolerate a brief recording of your personal traits if it will resolve your issue and allow you to tackle others. Or — like the ever-growing number of surveillance cameras we encounter on daily basis or the accessibility to your information via social networking sites, you likely don’t give a second thought about how much of your information is out there, and to what end it’s being used.